Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20801 (GAU)

ARATI DEVI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/4040/2024 · 2025-01-26

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010242492024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/4040/2024 ARATI DEVI W/O SRI RANJIT SAIKIA VILL AND P.O. DIPOTA DIST.SONITPUR, ASSAM PIN-784150 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3. 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (IRRIGATION) TEZPUR RANGAPARA DIVISION TEZPUR P.O. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 PIN-784001 5:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER TEZPUR MECHANICAL CIRCLE (IRRIGATION) TEZPUR P.O. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784001 6:SMTI. CHAYANIKA GAYAN W/O PRANJAL PRATIM NATH C/O EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TEZPUR RANGAPARA DIVISION (IRRIGATION) P.O. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784001. 7:SRI SUDARSHAN BHUYAN C/O THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TEZPUR TEZPUR RANGAPARA DIVISION (IRRIGATION) TEZPUR P.O. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION, SC, FINANCE,MR. R PHUKAN BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER 27.01.2025 Heard Ms. A. Khatun, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Page No.# 3/3 Phukan, learned counsel for the OP/respondent No.7, Mr. D. Borah, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, Assam appearing for the official respondents. This I.A. has been filed with a prayer to amend the cause title of WP(C) No.583/2024 by correcting the name of respondent No.7. According to the applicant, the correct name of respondent No.7 is “Sri Sudarshan Bhuyan” but it has been mistakenly mentioned as “Sri Sudham Bhuyan” in the cause title of WP(C) No.583/2024 . Hence, this I.A. Learned counsel for the respondents including Mr. R. Phukan submit that they would have no objection if the prayer is allowed. In view of the above, the prayer for correction of the name of respondent No.7 in the above terms stands allowed. The applicant to submit a fresh cause title in the connected writ petition within two weeks from today. I.A. stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant