Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20800 (RAJ)

GAJJU @ GAJANAND S/O SHRI AMBALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7094/2025 · 2025-07-04

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24769] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7094/2025 Gajju @ Gajanand S/o Shri Ambalal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mandolai, Police Station Mor, District Tonk (Raj.). (At Present In District Jail, Ajmer). ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rajaram Chaudhary, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.GA Mr. Vivek Sharma, Add.GA Mr. Kamlesh Sharma, Adv. for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 04/07/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 23.05.2025 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge No-1, Kekri (Ajmer) in connection with FIR No. 154/2025, registered at Police Station Kekri City, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 333 & 109(1) of BNS, 2023 & Section 3/25 of Arms Act, by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the injured/complainant of this case is the father-in-law of the accused-applicant. Learned counsel argues that the allegation against the accused-applicant is that he caused gun shot injury to [2025:RJ-JP:24769] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7094/2025] the leg of the injured/complainant. Learned counsel also argues that the accused-applicant was arrested on 16.05.2025 and since then, he is behind the bars. Learned counsel contends that the complainant-injured Shankar Lal and the accused-applicant entered into a compromise and settled their dispute amicably. Learned counsel further contends that the compromise deed is also annexed with this bail application. It is further submitted that both the parties are relatives. Learned counsel prays that the investigation will take time to conclude, therefore, the accused- applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. Mr. Kamlesh Sharma, learned counsel appears on behalf of the complainant and has admitted the factum of compromise between the parties and submits that the complainant has no objection if the bail of the accused-applicant is allowed. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the facts that parties have arrived at compromise and the compromise deed is placed on record; that the investigation will take time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused-applicant. 7. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Gajju @ Gajanand S/o Shri Ambalal, arrested in FIR No. 154/2025, registered at Police Station-Kekri City, District Ajmer [2025:RJ-JP:24769] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7094/2025] (Raj.) shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 8. The Accused-Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /216