Ramigani Girija Rani v. The A. P. Transmission Corporation Ltd.,
WP/10532/2012 · 2025-01-02
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20800 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20800 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010293272012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10532/2012 Between: Ramigani Girija Rani ...PETITIONER AND The A P Transmission Corporation Ltd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL
2. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following:
Order:- The petitioner is challenging the action of the respondents in not accepting the petitioner’s application and to provide 33 1/3%, reservation to women while considering the recruitment to the post of Junior Linemen.
2. This Court vide order dated 13.04.2012 directed the respondents to receive the application of the petitioner and process the same and allow the petitioner to participate in the selection process, pending further orders.
3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents has filed a counter, and drawn the attention of this Court to Para No.8 that, the petitioner has failed in the interview conducted by the Selection Committee, and as such he was not selected.
4. Recording the same, no further orders are required in this writ petition.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 02.01.2025 PNS