Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 207989 (MAD)

Vairakannu v. The District Collector,

WP(MD)/34039/2025 · 2025-11-27

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No. 34039 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :27.11.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD)No. 34039 of 2025 Vairakannu ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Thanjavur District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Peravurani Taluk, Thanjavur District. 4. Veera Singam 5. Chithra ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry and pass final order on the petitioner's Appeal Petition dated 06.10.2025 pending before the second respondents in respect of to rectification of mistakes occurred in the patta and other Revenue records of S.F. No. 221/21A corresponding New S.F.Nos.221/21A1, 221/21A2, 221/21A3 and 221/21B(221/21B1 and to 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 34039 of 2025 221/21B2) and also issue patta in the name of petitioner in respect of Old S.F.No. 221/21A corresponding New S.F.Nos. 221/21A1, 221/21A2, 221/21A3 for the correct extent 9 cent instead of 8.64 cents to the petitioner on that basis of the petitioner's registered sale deed dated 13.06.1996. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Paranjothi for M/s.KBS Law Office For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 O R D E R By asserting that the revenue records do not correctly reflect the total extent of 9 cents purchased by the petitioner under a sale deed dated 13.09.1996 and that the name of the fourth respondent is erroneously retained in the patta, the petitioner had submitted an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer. He seeks the early disposal thereof. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3. He submits that the appeal would be considered and disposed of on merits within three (3) months after providing a 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 34039 of 2025 reasonable opportunity to all parties thereto, including the private respondents. 3. In view of the above submissions of learned Additional Government Pleader, it is not necessary to issue notice to the private respondents in this Writ Petition. Instead, without making any observations on the merits, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's appeal on merits within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, the fourth and fifth respondents and any other parties thereto. No costs. NCS : Yes/No 27.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To 1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Thanjavur District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 34039 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J. apd 3. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Peravurani Taluk, Thanjavur District. ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No. 34039 of 2025 27.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis