IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (205) CWP-3863-2022 Date of Decision : July 30, 2025 Nidhi Sharma .. Petitioner Versus Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum- Maintenance Tribunal, Badkhal, Faridabad and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana. Mr. N.S. Sodhi, Advocate, for respondent No.2. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition was filed in the year 2022 and he is not in touch with the petitioner and does not know whether the petitioner intends to pursue the present writ petition hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case the petitioner still wants the order on merits. 2. Ordered accordingly. July 30, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.07.30 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document