Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20790 (RAJ)

SHYOJIRAM PUNIA S/O LATE SHRI SOHAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7166/2025 · 2025-07-11

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25745] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7165/2025 Ritesh S/o Shri Pokharmal Jat, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Puniyon Ki Dhani, Village Sarang Ka Bas, Post Durjniyawas, Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur West. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7166/2025 1. Shyojiram Punia S/o Late Shri Sohan Lal, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Puniyon Ki Dhani, Village Sarang Ka Bas, Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur West. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) 2. Sameer Punia S/o Shri Shyojiram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Puniyon Ki Dhani, Village Sarang Ka Bas, Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur West. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) 3. Rajkumar Punia S/o Tejaram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Puniyon Ki Dhani, Village Sarang Ka Bas, Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur West. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantnu Bansal Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. J.R. Chaudhary with Mr. Manish Mishra HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order [2025:RJ-JP:25745] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7165/2025] 11/07/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.148/2025 registered at Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur (West) for the offence punishable under Section(s) 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 329(3), 303(2), 110 & 351(3) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is civil suit is pending between the parties; the injuries caused to injured are not dangerous to life and it is a matter of cross FIR. They also submits that the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases and the fact that there is civil suit is pending between the parties; the injuries caused to injured are not dangerous to life and it is a matter of cross FIR, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:25745] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7165/2025] 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023 are allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioners namely 1. Ritesh S/o Shri Pokharmal Jat 2. Shyojiram Punia S/o Late Shri Sohan Lal 3. Sameer Punia S/o Shri Shyojiram 4. Rajkumar Punia S/o Tejaram shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /283-284