IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.853 of 2025 in CWP No.6054 of 2024 Decided on: 11.08.2025 Chandan Kumar … Petitioner Versus Pankaj Rai … Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Pushinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) CMP No.19277 of 2025 By way of this application, a prayer has been made for impleadment of the non-applicant/respondent as a party respondent on the ground that the said party is a necessary party. 2. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the proposed non-applicant/respondent is ordered to be impleaded as respondent in the writ petition. Applications stand disposed of. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 COPC No.853 of 2025 3. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that appropriate orders in terms of the judgment in issue shall positively be passed by the Authority concerned within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is taken on record. 4. These proceedings are accordingly closed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek the revival thereof, if the needful is not done within a period of three weeks from today by the Authority concerned. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 11, 2025 (Vinod)