1 2025:CGHC:21704 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 3644 of 2025 Vijay Yadav S/o Late Devwani Yadav Aged About 24 Years R/o Rajeev Nagar Ward No. 10 Supela Bhilai District - Durg (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station Houe Officer Police Station Supela Durg (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 09.05.2025 1. This is the first bail applications filed under Section 483 of the BNSS for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 285/2025 registered at Police Station – Supela, District- Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 296, 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act. 2. Prosecution case in brief is that the complainant preferred a complaint on 14.03.2025 alleging that the Complainant Vijay Yadav was having heated PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.05.12 11:18:05 +0530 2 argument with a FekoDeviresident of the locality, and the applicant tried to intervene and stop the argument upon which the complainant started hurling abuses to the applicant and the allegation is that the applicant assaulted the complainant with knife due to which the complainant sustained injuries. On the basis of aforesaid, an FIR bearing No. FIR No 285/2025 was registered under Section, 296,109(1)of BNS 2023 and 25, 27 of arms act against the applicant. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. She further submits that the applicant is said to have caused injury by knife in the abdomen of the injured and it is stated that as per the MLC report there is no opinion of the Doctor that the injury was found to be grievous in nature. Further, the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents which has been compromised, the charge-sheet has been filed and the applicant is in jail since 15.03.2025, trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion therefore, she prays for grant of bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant and submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed. He further submitted that the applicant is said to have caused injury by knife in the abdomen of the injured which is vital part of the body and as per the query report, such an injury could be life-threatening, further the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents, hence the bail application of the applicant is liable to be rejected. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents taken on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the fact that the applicant is said to have caused injury by knife in the abdomen of the injured which is vital 3 part of the body and as per the query report, such an injury could be life-threatening, hence, the bail application of the applicant is rejected. 7. Accordingly the bail application of the applicant, namely, Vijay Yadav involved in Crime No. 285/2025 registered at Police Station – Supela, District- Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 296, 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, is rejected. 8. Needless to say that the trial Court concerned is at liberty to proceed and conclude the trial expeditiously. 9. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti