APHC010292722020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19330/2020 Between: 1. PILLI SUNDEEP, S/O.PILLI VENKATAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 0CC. ADVOCATE HIGH COURT OF AP, R/O SRINIVASANAGAR COLONY, BEHIND DISTRICT COURT MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. PILLI VENKATAPPAIAH, S/O.P.NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 0CC. ADVOCATE, R/O.SRINIVASANAGAR COLONY, BEHIND DISTRICT COURT MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. Y AJAY KUMAR, DETECTIVE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SR NAGAR POLICE STATION, HYDERABAD, STATE OF TELANGANA. PH.NO. 9490616232 4. SRINU, HOME GUARD, SR NAGAR POLICE STATION, HYDERABAD, STATE OF TELANGANA. PH.NO. 9985912660. 5. NAGESWARA RAO, , POLICE CONSTABLE, SR NAGAR POLICE STATION, HYDERABAD, STATE OF TELANGANA. PH.NO. 7901103592. 6. M VENKATA NARAYANA, SHO CHILAKALAPUDI POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. PH.NO. 8332983789 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to protect the petitioners from the respondents 3 to 6 and the petitioners 2 prays this Honble Court to give a direction to SR Nagar police, Hyderabad, Telangana and Chilkalapudi police station, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh not to interfere with the rights of the petitioners 1 and 2, the petitioners 1 and 2 may take into consideration the insult that has been faced by them under the hands of the police, address the concerned police department to give stringent punishment to the respondents 3 to 6 and also to see that damages and compensation is paid to petitioners Nos 1 and 2 for defamation, wrongful restraint and for other offences and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PILLI HARSHINI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioners. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioners today. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent/State is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 19330 of 2020 04.09.2025 Mjl /*