HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 46897 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit, filed today, is taken on record. 2. Heard Mr. Meraj Ahmad Khan, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Krishna Madhaw Pandey, learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 3. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased quash the impugned charge sheet No.145/2018 dated 04.09.2018 and cognizance/summoning order dated 04.12.2019 passed by Additional District Judge Court No.14, Moradabad as well as proceeding of Session Trial No.1360 of 2021, State Versus Jasim and others, (Arising out of case Crime NO.186 of 2018), Under Section 147,323,324,352,506 I.P.C., Police Station Mainather, District Moradabad. Pending in the court of Additional District Judge Court No.14, Moradabad on the basis of compromise dated 29.10.2025." 4. Learned Counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants and opposite party No.2 have compromised the dispute. It is further argued that the said compromise has also been verified by the concerned Trial Court, as such the proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. 5. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 admitted the fact of compromise and stated that he has no objection if the proceeding of the aforesaid case is quashed against the applicants. 6. From the perusal of the record it is apparent that parties have entered in to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Meraj Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Krishna Madhaw Pandey Jasim And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) compromise and have settled their dispute amicably. 7. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 8. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings as prayed for by the applicants. 9. The entire proceedings of the aforesaid case are hereby quashed. 10. The present application is allowed. April 20, 2026 Vijay NA528 No. 46897 of 2025 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad