Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20775 (RAJ)

SUNIL KUMAR S/O MAHESH KUMAR v. MADAN LAL S/O BHAGLA

CW/9191/2024 · 2025-02-25

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8454] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9191/2024 Sunil Kumar S/o Mahesh Kumar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Katrathal, Tehsil And District Sikar. ----Petitioner/Non-Applicant Versus 1. Madan Lal S/o Bhagla, R/o Village Katrathal Tehsil And District Sikar. 2. Gokul Devi W/o Mahesh Kumar, 3. Raju Devi W/o Gopal, 4. Vimla Devi W/o Brijendra, 5. Khurdaram S/o Bhagla, 6. Shrawan Kumar S/o Bhagla, 7. Kamla Devi W/o Jagan, 8. Dinesh Kumar S/o Jagan, 9. Mukesh Kumar S/o Jagan, 10. Swaroopnarayan S/o Jagan, All are R/o Village Katrathal Tehsil And District Sikar. 11. Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Branch Katrathal, Tehsil And District Sikar. 12. Punjab National Bank, Branch Piprali, Tehsil And District Sikar. 13. Patwari Halka Sinhasan, Tehsil And District Sikar. 14. Patwari Halka Katrathal, Tehsil And District Sikar. 15. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Sikar. ----Proforma Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Adhiraj Modi Ms. Aayushi Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Bhardwaj HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 25/02/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:8454] (2 of 2) [CW-9191/2024] This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:- “(i) The Land Settlement Officer and Ex-officio Revenue Appellate Authority, Sikar is directed to decide the appeal no.90/2023: Sunil Kumar Vs. Gokul Devi and Others within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order.” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/39