M/s Sushil General Store vs. Roop Singh Cr. Revision No.293 of 2025 25.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Notice issued against respondent received back after due service. Despite service, no one has put appearance on his behalf. Further wait is not justifiable. Call for the record. Cr. MP No. 3147 of 2025 By way of the present application, indulgence of this Court has been sought to comply with the order dated 04.06.2025, passed in Cr.MP No.2268 of 2025. Considering the factual position, as mentioned, in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavit of the applicant, the application is allowed. Let order dated 04.06.2025, be complied with, on or before 30th August, 2025, failing which, the protection, which has been granted to the petitioner, shall stand withdrawn automatically, without further reference to the Court and in that eventuality, the learned trial Court will be at liberty to proceed further, against the applicant, in accordance with law. (Virender Singh) Judge July 25, 2025 (ps)