Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20766 (AP)

CHOLLANGI SATYA SHANKARA VARMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14592/2024 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010292242024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14592/2024 Between: 1. CHOLLANGI SATYA SHANKARA VARMA, S/O. GANAPATHI RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 13-15-4, DIBBALAPALEM, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 2. KANDIPALLI SURYA PRAKASH,, S/O. LATE SATYANARYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/O. D. NO. 29-19-10, OLD JAIL ROAD, GOLLALAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P. POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, SURYABAGH, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, EAST SUB-DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, II TOWN, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DANYAMRAJU UMA MAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent authorities more particularly the Respondent No.6 in opening the Rowdy Sheet Nos.01/2012 and 02/2012 in II Town Police Station II Town Visakhapatnam City Visakhapatnam District against the Petitioners even though the Petitioners were acquitted in the said criminal case Cr No 82/2012 vide S C No 144/2013 dated 29 12 2021 as illegal arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and in utter violation of the judgment in W P Nos 21247/2016 and Batch dated 15 07 2022 rendered by the Honourable A P High Court and direct the Respondent authorities to close the Rowdy Sheet Nos 01/2012 and 02/2012 in II Town Police Station II Town Visakhapatnam City Visakhapatnam District opened against the Petitioners” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that no cases are pending against the petitioners. It is further stated that, to curb and curtail the unlawful activities of the Petitioners in the vicinity, Rowdy Sheets were opened against the Petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, the cases registered against the Petitioners were ended in acquittal and no cases are pending against them. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned Rowdy Sheet Nos.01 of 2012 and 02 of 2012 on the file of II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, against the Petitioners are hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14592 of 2024 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr