IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 456 of 2025 Date of Decision: 6.10.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Aruna Rani and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State. Mr. Sarthak Upadhyay, ADvocate vice Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Since it is apparent from the reply filed by the respondents that at present, petitioners stand reengaged, no action of the respondents can be said to be contumacious and as such, present petition is disposed of. Notices stand discharged. Needless to say, petitioners herein, who are working in College on PTA basis, shall not be relieved till the disposal of the main case. October 6, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge