Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20764 (AP)

GOKEDA YESU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/6023/2025 · 2025-07-02

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANE)HRA PRADESH AT AMA THURSDAY, THE TLi!RD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ri,.'''-'¥Tii`RE : PRE§,ENT: tfads= THE HONOURABLE SRI JuRSFieE K SREENIVASA REDDY -ff=+st CRIMINAL PE"Ti®RI. NO: 6023 OF 2025 Betwee n : Gokeda Yesu Kumar, s/o, Late Apparao, Age 24 yea-rs, R/o. Satyavaram Village, V,Madugula Mandal, Anakapaili District. ... Petitioner/Accused No,1 - ;fiRE,B . The State Of Andhra Pradesh, (\/-. iviadugu]a Police Station) Rep. by the public prosecutor High Court of Andhra~Pradesh Amaravati, Guntur District. .I . `'',l`` .... Respondent/Comp[ainant petition under section 480 &± `4S-3 '`of|BNSS is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiiec! in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to r`e'eJase him on regular bail in connection with Crime No.222 of 2024 of V. Madirguia Police Station. I The petition coming on for heriring, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof amdLe!jpon hearing the arguments of SRI ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN AdvoGa€er 'for the Petitioner, Assistant Public prosecutor for the respondent and +lire C;Quit made the following. ORDER €..I APHCO10292482025 lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3327] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6023/2025 Betwee n : 1.GOKEDA YESU KUMAR, S/O. LATE APPARAO, AGE 24 YEARS, R/O. SATYAVARAM VILLAGE, V.MADUGULA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. .HPETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, (V. Madugula Police Station) Rep. by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT petition under section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to release him on regular ba'Il in connection With Crime No.222 of 2024 of V. Madugula Police Station, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN- Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the <`-t*.tlr I,- i--5 2 pet'lt-loner/A1, seeking bail, in Crime No.222/2024 of V.Madugula Police station, Anakapal[e District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner and Others for the offences under -Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 12.ll,2024 at 4.00pm, on receipt of credible information regarding illegal possession and transportation of ganja, the S.I of Police, along with staff, reached BT Road (Paderu to Visakhapatnam) outskirts of Sagaram village and started conducting vehicle checking. They found one Auto bearing registration no.AP 31 TC 1700 coming towards ghat road side. On seeing police, the inmates in the Auto stopped the Auto and escaped. Then police searched the Auto and found 12kgs of ganja. The contraband was seized and on 10.4.2025 accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. 4. Heard learned counsel forthe Petitioner and the learned Assistant public prosecutor for respondent-State. Perused the record, 5. Leamed Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that majOrPartOfthe investigation is completed except filing of charge sheet. €--sJan, - -JF> -_-A ex` 3 6. A perusal of the material available on record goes to showthat the contraband that was allegedly seI-Zed from the Auto was 12 kgs of ganja which is not a commercial quantity. The petitioner was arrested on 10.4.2025 and since then, the petitioner has been in judicI-al remand. It appears that major Part Of the I-nVeStigatiOn has been completed except filing of charge sheet. 7. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner hereI-n, On the following conditions. (i) The petitioner/Al herein shall be released on his executI'ng a Personal bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional DI'StrjCt and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam,- (ii) On release, the petitioner shall appear before the station House Officer concerned once in a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 a.m. and o5.00 p.m., till filing of charge sheet. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. To, ksr I I lTFXHE: Cds:ds®PY I I . i. .` `~.= ,A ASSISTANlasG SD/-M,SRIN!VAS iSTRAR SECT!Oni OFFICER 1. The I Addltional Dlstrlct & sess!aor!s Judge, vlsakhapatnam 2 The superlntendent, central pnson, vISakhapatnam DI'Stnct. 3. The SHO, V.Madugula Poll'ce sfa{iQn, Anakapal'I' Dlstrl'ct 4. One cc to SRI ARRABOLU SA! NAVEEN Advocate [opucJ 5. Two ccs to PUBLIC PROSEC'JTOR, HIgh Court ofAndhra Pradesh.[ouTJ 6. One spare copy ` HIGH',-COURT SRK, J DATED : 03/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.6023 of 2025 ALLOWED