Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20761 (KAR)

SRI SATTAR KHAN v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/8436/2021 · 2025-02-28

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8822 WP No. 8436 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 8436 OF 2021 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. SATTAR KHAN, S/O LATE MUSTHAFA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT MUDDALINGAHALLI VILLAGE, THYAMAGOUNDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.R.DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHSILDAR, NELAMANGALA TALUK, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. 2. SMT. JAIBUNNISA, W/O LATE WAHAB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 3. HAYUB KHAN, S/O LATE WAHAB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 4. AYEESHA BEGU, D/O LATE WAHAB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 5. ZEENATHUNNISA, D/O LATE WAHAB KHAN, Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8822 WP No. 8436 of 2021 AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 6. HAYAZ KHAN, S/O LATE WAHAB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 7. NAYAZ KHAN, S/O LATE WAHAB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 8. AYAJ KHAN, S/O LATE WAHAB KHAN , AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, 9. HAKEEM KHAN, S/O LATE HAYATH KHAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 9 ARE R/AT MUDDALINGANAHALLI VILLAGE, THYAMAGOUNDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1; SRI.C.R.VENKATESH, ADVOCATE FOR R9; R7 - SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM DATED 10.03.2021 PASSED BY R1 AT ANENXURE - E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8822 WP No. 8436 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The petitioner who is before this Court states that he has engaged Sri. A.C. Manjunath, learned counsel to appear in the matter. 2. It appears two counsels have filed vakalath in view of death of earlier counsel. 3. In the light of the statement made by the petitioner, who is present before the Court, Sri. S.R. Deshpande, learned counsel is permitted to retire from the case. 4. The memo seeking withdrawal of the petition is taken on record. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo. SD/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14