Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20760 (RAJ)

PANCHAM SINGH SON OF JAAHAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7132/2025 · 2025-06-02

Mukesh Rajpurohit V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22887] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7132/2025 Pancham Singh Son Of Jaahar Singh, Resident Of Rithaura Khurd Pachauripura Police Station Sarai Chhola District Morena Madhya Pradesh ( At Present In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Order 02/06/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 129/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2) of BNS, 29, 51 of Wildlife Protection Act, 1973 and Sections 41 and 42 of Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the matter is with regard to theft of Bajri. The petitioner is behind the bars since 21.05.2025. The offences are triable by Magistrate and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:22887] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7132/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Pancham Singh son of Jaahar Singh is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J CHANDAN/avg/94