2025:JHHC:27784 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.4740 of 2025 ---- Punit Kumar Sharma aged about 66 years S/O Late Baijnath Sharma R/O 136, Sanjay Road, SNP Area, P.O.-and P.S.- Sakchi, District East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur-831001, Jharkhand. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The state of Jharkhand through Secretary, Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission, having office at: 1st Floor, Jharkhand State Housing Board, (old Headquarter), Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. & P.S. Argora, District-Ranchi-834002. 2. Vikram Sharma, Son of Late Dilip Kumar Sharma; 3. Anita Sharma D/O Late Dilip Kumar Sharma; 4. Anuradha Sharma D/O Late Dilip Kumar Sharma; Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 4, Resident of 136, Sanjay Road, SNP Area, P.O and P.S Sakchi, District East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur-831001, Jharkhand. Director, Tata Steel Ltd., having registered office at Bombay House, 24, Homi Mody Street, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.-Homi Street, District- Mumbai, Maharashtra. …. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Navin Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shashank Kumar, Adv. Mr. Amitabh Prasad, Adv. Mr. Pratyush Raj, Adv. ---- 05/Dated: 11th September, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- “A. For issuance of writ of any nature setting aside the order dated 22.11.2024 in Appeal No. EOJ/10 of 2024 wherein the Ld. Ombudsman did not consider the submissions of the Petitioner and failed to admit the appeal against the order dated 08.02.2024. B. For issuance of writ of any nature thereby directing the Respondent to allow the hearing to be granted to the Petitioner as not admitting the appeal against the order dated 08.02.2024 passed by the Ld. CGRF, Jamshedpur in MISC/CGRF/TSL/12/18 would amount to violation of the principles of natural justice qua the petitioner.” 2025:JHHC:27784 Page | 2 W.P. (C) No.4740 of 2025 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh one with better particulars. 3. Learned counsel for respondents has no objection.’ 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded