- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6519 CRP No. 224 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 224 OF 2021 BETWEEN: SMT. CHAITHRA M W/O SHRI MANJUNATH B AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/A NEAR WATER TANK K CHANNASANDRA HORAMAVU POST BENGALURU -560043 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH TIMMANNA HEBBAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI D NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE DODDA ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 2. SMT NANJAMMA W/O SHRI D NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT60 YEARS 3. SHRI SRIDHAR S/ O SHRI D NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 3 ARE R/A LINGANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 561203 Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6519 CRP No. 224 of 2021 4. SMT PADMAVATHI J N @ PADMA W/O SHRI PRAKASH M AND D/O SHRI D NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS NO 186/1 T M S BUILDING V P ROAD NEAR 271-D BUS TOP BAHUBALINAGAR JALAHALLI VILLAGE BENGALURU – 560013 5. SMT GAYATHRI J N W/O SHRI KADARAPPA D/O SHRI D NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO 34 KARENAHALLI VILLAGE ANTHRAHALLI POST DODABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562103 6. SMT GOWRAMMA W/O SHRI CHIKKAGUNDAPPA D/O LATE DODDA ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS KORATHIBUVAHALLI VILLAGE BENMARNALLI POST VEMAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563101 …RESPONDENTS R4 & R6 SERVED - UNREPRESENTED THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.02.2021 PASSED ON I.A.NO.4 IN O.SNO.79/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODDABALLAPURA, DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.4 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6519 CRP No. 224 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.79/2019 was dismissed on 16.12.2022. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 4. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL