Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 207498 (MAD)

J.Ravichandran v. Pasupathi

CMP(MD)/17050/2025 · 2025-10-29

C V Karthikeyan, R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD) NO. 17050 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CMP(MD) NO. 17050 of 2025 IN AS(MD) SR NO. 82205 OF 2025 J.Ravichandran Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Pasupathi 2. Raamuthai 3. Jothi 4. Samuthrayi alias Samuthra Thai 5. Angammal 6. Veerapathiran 7. Saradha 8. Vimal Raj 9. Vijayendran 10. Yogaraj alias Ravi Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Arjun Varman for M/s.Roy And Roy Associates Prayer:To Grant Leave to the petitioner to appeal AS(MD) SR No.82205 of 2025 on the file of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court and thus render justice. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the purchaser of the property from Panjavarnam and her sons even much prior to the suit in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the year 2012. He had also pointed out that the suit is technically an ex-parte decree with the family members of the vendor remaining ex-parte before the trial Court. 2. Taking all the facts and circumstances, leave is granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal as against the judgment and decree of the trial Court. (C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J.) (R.VIJAYAKUMAR J.) 29-10-2025 am https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis