APHC010291892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI m TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT honourable SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PFTlTinM mo- OF JUNE 2025 Between: Talagana Lingaraju, S/o Late Krishna Assistant, Murthy, Aged 62 years Occ : School eddanchala Village Palasa Mandal.Srikakulam District ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, r of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi. 2. Kollana Hemalatha, Aged about 45 years, R/o Goppili Village Mehaputti Mandalam, Srikakulam District Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court ...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed praying that in the of Grounds of Criminal Petition ... , , proceedings in CC 128/2019 file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, circumstances stated in the Memorandum High Court may be pleased , the on the Tekkali against the Petitioner. / / / lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal further Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in CC 128/2019, on the file the of Judicial First Class Magistrate,Tekkali. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER : / / APHC010291892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) BM0 [3457] ■n 0 TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6166/2025 Between: Talagana Lingaraju ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent/complalnant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 0 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is respondent. However, a complaint is 2. nd disputing the relationship with the 2 filed alleging offences under Section 498 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that the petitioner was married to the respondent and she went missing in the year 2012. Thereafter, he filed a complaint and the police after completing the nd sister of the 2 investigation have closed the case as undetectable. It is submitted that the petitioner is a government employee and scheduled to retire in the month of August, 2025. Eyeing on the service benefits, the 2"^^ respondent has now filed a false complaint. 3. The dispute with regard to the marriage relationship between the petitioner and the 2""' respondent was elicited by the Investigating Officer by recording the statements of LW4 to LW10. These are questions of fact which are to be heard during the course of trial. 4. Considering the age of the petitioner, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, dispensing the presence of the petitioner in C.C.No.128 of 2019 the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tekkali, except for the dates when the presence of the petitioner is required, as directed by the learned Magistrate, for the purpose of trial. on 3 \ 5. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand SD/- B.CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR closed. IT. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tekkali, Srikakulam District 2. One CC to Sri. M. Sapthagiri Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies at Stu TAC HIGH COURT DATED: 24/06/2025 ORDER CRLP No.6166/2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION