SMT CHANCHALA DEVI AND ANR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS
WPC/140/2013 · 2025-07-23
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20745 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20745 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2019:JHHC:40013] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No.140 of 2013
------
1. Smt. Chanchala Devi W/o Sri Dineshwar Prasad
2. Kiran Devi @ Kiran Sahu w/o Dukharan Sahu residents of Mohalla Hehal, P.O.- Hehal, P.S.- Sukhdeonagar/Pandra O.P. Ranchi, District Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Special Officer S.A.R., Ranchi
2. The Deputy Commissioner Ranchi.
3. The Commissioner Chotanagpur South devision Ranchi
4. The Circle Inspector Town Anchal Ranchi
5. The Circle Officer Town Anchal Ranchi.
6. Chilgu Oraon S/o Late Manga Oraon
7. Bikash Oraon S/o of Chilgu Oraon Both of residents of village Hehal, P.O.- Hehal, P.S.- Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi
8. Sunil Oraon S/o not known said to be nephew of a Rtd. Dy. S.P. viz. Jhuba Oraon R/o Tangra Toli, P.O.- Hehal, P.S.- Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi .... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : None
For the Respondents : Mr. Munna Lal Yadav, SC (L&C) III
Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Rakesh Kr. Shah, Advocate
------
Order No:-13 Dated:-23-07-2025
Heard the learned counsel for the respondents.
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since there is no merit in this Writ Petition, hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this Writ Petition.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/