Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20741 (KAR)

SMT. SHASHIKALA R v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8704/2025 · 2025-07-02

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23715 WP No. 8704 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.8704 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHASHIKALA R AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O. RAMAKRISHNAIAH, R/AT. SRINIVAS NAGAR, GORUR VILLAGE, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562120. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANDANAPPA GURAPPA BALLOLLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, M.S.BUILDING, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGAR, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT -562159. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562159. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23715 WP No. 8704 of 2025 4. THE THASILDAR MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT -562120. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDERATION THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23/08/2022 OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND SY. NO.74, BLOCK NO. 4, MEASURING 1 ACRE 10 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT GORUR VILLAGE, SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT, (PRESENTLY RAMNAGAR DISTRICT). WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS PER ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Smt. Savithramma, learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner herein has sought for a direction to the respondents to conduct phody and durust in respect of the subject land. In this regard, petitioner has made a - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23715 WP No. 8704 of 2025 representation dated 23.08.2022, as per Annexure-A to respondent No.4. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that petitioner has to approach the competent authority through online. 4. Having taken note of the factual aspects on record, petitioner is directed to approach the competent authority by submitting application through online. If such an application is made through online, same shall be considered by the competent authority, in accordance with law, expeditiously. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44