Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20738 (JHR)

URMILA DEVI ALIAS KUNTI DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4222/2025 · 2025-08-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:22932] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4222 of 2025 1. Urmila Devi @ Kunti Devi, aged about 55 years, wife of Late Dhurkheli Roy. 2. Upendra Roy, aged about 32 years. 3. Mithu Roy @ Mithilesh Roy, Mitu Ray 4. Ranjit Roy, aged about 19 years. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 are sons of Late Dhurkheli Roy. All resident of Village-Bajpur, P.O. Nayagaon, P.S.-Bounsi, District-Banka, Bihar. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Amarjeet Prasad, Advocate. For the State : Mr. S.K. Keshri, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 11.08.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024, registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 76, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all these petitioners. He submits that scuffle has taken place with regard to cultivation of the grain. He further submits that even the old lady, who is petitioner No. 1 has been falsely implicated in this case. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there and one Bhola Ray has [2025:JHHC:22932] -2- received the grievous injury in that scuffle. 5. From the FIR, it transpires that the scuffle has taken place due to some dispute with regard to cultivation of grains and there are general and omnibus allegations against all the petitioners and further it has not come that on whose assault, the grievous injury was caused to the injured Bhola Ray, I am inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda, in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-