2025:JHHC:23037 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6893 of 2025 --------- Tuleshwar Turi, aged about 35 years son of Late Nunuchand Turi, resident of village Badki Sidhawara Tola Dudhi Gadha P.O. Chatrochatti, P.S. Chatrochatti, District Bokaro. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Prajapati, Advocate Mr. Sushawant Bhowmik, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-08.08.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Section 376 (2)(n) of I.P.C. in connection with S.T. No.130/2025 arising out of Penk Narayanpur P.S. Case No.14 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.415/2024. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the victim and the petitioner knew each other for one year before the FIR was lodged and both the parties were having love affair with each other and from the FIR it is clear that there is no specific date and time of occurrence mentioned in the FIR as to when the occurrence actually took place. He further submits that there are no cogent and admissible evidences against the petitioner and the whole story is based on conjecture and surmises. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 28.01.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 2025:JHHC:23037 2 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Session Judge-II, FTC, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with S.T. No.130/2025 arising out of Penk Narayanpur P.S. Case No.14 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.415/2024. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-