Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20735 (JHR)

SIPTEN RAZA ALIAS CHHOTU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4867/2024 · 2025-03-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4867 of 2024 ------ Sipten Raza @ Chhotu, aged about 27 years, son of Neyajuddin Hussain, Resident of Village –Bandega, Post Office & Police Station –Talsara, District –Sundargarh, State – Odisha. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.04 Dated- 20.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Senha P.S. Case No.45 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of Bolero Vehicle of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-18 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the said Bolero Vehicle has already been recovered. It is further submitted that only because the Bolero Vehicle was recovered from, in front of house of the petitioner, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.20,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Lohardaga, in connection with Senha P.S. Case No.45 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-