Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 11495 of 2025 Date of Decision: 14.08.2025 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Sanju Devi
…….Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent- State.
Mr. Rajesh Parkash, Advocate, for respondent no.4.
_______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Learned counsel representing the petitioner states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge August 14, 2025 (shankar)
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?