Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20734 (AP)

MARASU SANDEEP v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/6053/2025 · 2025-06-25

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RA CRIMINAL PE"TION NO: 6053 OF 2025 Betwee n : Marasu Sandeep, S/o. Vasu, Age 28 years, R/o. H.No.30,13th Cross Street, North Prakash Nagarv, Thiruninravur Tiruvallur, Tamilnadu. ...petitioner/Accused No.5 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor High court of Andhra Pradesh through the SHO, KasimkOta Police Station , Anakapa]]e D'lstr'lct. ...Respondent/Complainant petition under section 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023 (Old Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the Circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Grim-lnal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow this pet'ltion by granting regular bail tO the Petitioner/accused No.5 who was in judicial custody at Sub Jail , Visakhapatnam from o6.12.2024, in the Crime Nor.296/2024 of Kasimkota Police Station; Anakapa[]e District. counselforthepetitioner : Ms. KM RKamala counsel for the Respondent : Assistant Publ-lc Prosecutor. The Court made the fo[[owing ORDER: + f| IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6053/2025 Between : Marasu Sandeep AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.KM R KAMALA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: [3521] H.PETITIONER/ACCUSED ..IRESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity [the BNSS'), seeking to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.5 on bail in Cr.No.296 of 2024 of Kasimkota Police Station, AnakapaIIe District, registered against the petitl'oner/Accused No.5 herein for the offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) and 25 read with 8(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity [the NDPS Act''). I_'\ I-\ 2. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is thaton o6.12.2024, on receipt of credible information, the sub-inspector of police along with hI'S Staff and mediators rushed to Atcharla Junction of Kasimkota MandaI, Anakapalli District and caught the accused in possession of 60 kgs of Ganja. The contraband along with other material was seized under the cover of mediators report. 3. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 4. Ms.KMR Kamala, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence; the petitioner is innocent; the petitioner was falsely implicated,I he would abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court and urged that the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 5. On the other hand, Ms.P.Akila Naidu, learned Assistant public prosecutor, opposed in granting of bail stating that the contraband allegedly involved in the Present Crime iS 60 kgs of ganja, which is a commercial quantity and the investigation is still underway and urged to dismiss the petition. 6. Taking into consideration I_h_e.fag,i that the petitl'oner has been in J'ail for the Past 202 days, the alleged contraband seized from the possession of the ` .., . rf.--,---_.__ Petitioner and Other accused Was 60 Kgs of Ganja and this is the second bail application filed seeking for enlarging the petitioner on bail, accused Nos.3, 4, 6 -----.- and 7 were already enlarged on bail vide CrI.P.No-4216 of 2025, the nature of the allegations leveled against the petitioner in the complaint, and the specific t'E= \to .. . I ,`-,., `.``. z9 role played by the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on ba" with strict conditions. 8. ln the result, the Cr®lminal Petition iS allowed With the following COndit'lOnS: -I) The petitioner/accused No.5 shall be enlarged On bail Subject to the executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand Only), With two Sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional District & sessions Judge-Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, V-lsakhaPatnam. ii) The petitioner/accused No.5 shall appear before the Station Kasimkota Police Station, Anakapalle District, On Saturday once in two weeks in between 10-.00 am and 05:00 pm., till the conclusion of the Trial. iii) The petitioner/accused No.5 shall not d-lreCtly Or -Indirectly influence or threaten or meet the witnesses includ']ng the de- facto complainant. SD/-M.E ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFF J Fo _..1 I I`E=UISrF{AR To, 1. The I Additional District & Session Judge-Spec'laI Judge for Tr-lal of offences under NDPS Act'. Visakhapatnam. 2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Stat'lon House Officer, Kasimkota Police Station, Anakapalle District. 4. One CC to Ms. K M R Kamala, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. One spare copy HIGH COURT Dr.YLR,J DATE D.. 26/06/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.6053 of 2025 ALLOWED _,rJ'... ,I