Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20731 (PNJ)

RAJESH KUMAR AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/10648/2001 · 2025-05-21

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Rajesh Kumar a State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: None Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed, directing the respondents as contractual employees in the Department. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions received from the Department, vide memo dated 10. Annexure A, contends that all the teaching personnel working on contract basis in the Directorate of Secondary Education have been granted regular pay scale with effect from 17.04.1998 vide letter dated 06.08.2001. 3. Accordingly, the relief granted, and the matter has been rendered infructous. 4. Disposed of as such. May 21, 2025 ps IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10648 Date of Decision :21.05.2025 and another Versus of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA None for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed, inter alia, directing the respondents not to reduce the petitioners’ salary who as contractual employees in the Department. Learned State counsel, on instructions received from the Department, vide memo dated 10.9.2001, which is retained Annexure A, contends that all the teaching personnel working on contract basis in the Directorate of Secondary Education have been granted regular pay scale with effect from 17.04.1998 vide letter dated 06.08.2001. Accordingly, the relief claimed by the pet granted, and the matter has been rendered infructous. isposed of as such. May 21, 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 10648-2001 Date of Decision :21.05.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus not to reduce the petitioners’ salary who are working Learned State counsel, on instructions received from the .2001, which is retained on the case file as Annexure A, contends that all the teaching personnel working on contract basis in the Directorate of Secondary Education have been granted regular pay scale with effect from 17.04.1998 vide letter dated 06.08.2001. claimed by the petitioners already stands granted, and the matter has been rendered infructous. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No mandamus working Learned State counsel, on instructions received from the file as Annexure A, contends that all the teaching personnel working on contract basis in the Directorate of Secondary Education have been granted regular pay scale itioners already stands TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.23 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document