Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20730 (KAR)

THE BRANCH MANAGER v. PRAVEEN @ PRAVEEN G N

WP/9420/2024 · 2025-03-14

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11427 WP No. 9420 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 9420 OF 2024 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: THE BRANCH MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, BELLAD AND CO., BUILDING ABOVE HERO HONDA SHOW ROOM, BANNIGIDA STOP, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI - 580 030. NOW REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 9TH FLOOR, THE ESTATE 121, DICKENSON ROAD, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 042. COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 .…PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.N. KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. PRAVEEN @ PRAVEEN G. N., W/O LATE. NAGARAJA @ NAGARAJ MARAKALA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O ‘CHAYANANDAN’ NETHAJINAGAR, GILIYAR, KUNDAPUR TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 221. NOW R/O C.K. PURA, KELAGOTE, CHITRADURGA. 2. SHARANAVVA BHARAMAPPA BAVIMANI MAJOR R/O HOUSE NO.100, WARD NO.2, BILEKAL VILLAGE Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11427 WP No. 9420 of 2024 KUSHTAGI TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT – 583 231. …RESPONDENTS (R1 AND R2 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER AS PER ANNEXURE-E DATED 28.11.2013 PASSED BY PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM CHITRADURGA ON IA NO. 1 FILED U/O 7 RULE 11 (D) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC READ WITH 166 (3) OF IMV ACT IN MVC NO. 1207/2022 ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND HOLD CLAIM PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-A IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has moved a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO The petitioner submits that as the Claim petition is within the statute of limitation, the above writ petition may be dismissed.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ/List No.: 4 Sl No.: 16/CT:PH