ARTI AHIRWAR v. UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI AND ANOTHER
WP(C)/363/2025 · 2025-02-18
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2073 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2073 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S.No. 108 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 363/2025 CM No. 814/2025
Arti Ahirwar …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Sunil Dogra, Advocate vice Mr. A.R. Khan, Advocate. Vs
Union of India and Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 18.02.2025
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy under law by way of filing a representation before the appropriate authority. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn along with connected application, with liberty as prayed for.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 18.02.2025 Ram Krishan
Ram Krishan 2025.02.18 03:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document