Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010239782024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./205/2024 RITUMONI BORAH S/O- SRI GHANAKANTA BORAH, RESIDENT OF VILL- SUTAR NAMKURI, PART-II, P.O.- BORPANI, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM- 782141. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-
06.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007. 3:CHAIRMAN STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD MADHABDEVPUR REHABARI GUWAHATI- 781008.
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NAGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K HUSSAIN, MR P UPADHYAYA,MR D BANIA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WA/335/2024 RITUMONI BORAH S/O- SRI GHANAKANTA BORAH RESIDENT OF VILL- SUTAR NAMKURI PART-II P.O.- BORPANI DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM- 782141. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF HOME DISPUR GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007. 3:CHAIRMAN STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD MADHABDEVPUR REHABARI GUWAHATI- 781008.
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NAGAON ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. A K BARUAH Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 10.02.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)
Heard Mr. A. K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner; and Ms. Sumita Sarma, learned Government Advocate, Assam, appearing on behalf of all the respondents, at some length.
It is seen that admittedly, the writ petitioner has not produced the documents which he is now placing reliance, either, before the recruiting agency, or, before the learned Single Judge, and/or, before this Court at the time of hearing the connected writ appeal being W.A. No. 335/2024.
Hence, we do not find any merit in this review petition for review of the order, impugned, herein, in the present proceeding.
The review petition, accordingly, stands dismissed.
No costs.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant