IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No. 29803 of 2025 Venkatesan … Petitioner/A7 Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police Vellimedupettai Police Station Villupuram District Crime No. 132 of 2025. ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS Act, 2023 seeking to enlarge the petitioner in the event of arrest in connection with the crime No.132 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Muruganandham For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ---- O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 8(c), 20(b) (II) (B), 25 and 29(1) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.132 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2.The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is also involved in the possession of 3 kilograms of Ganja and it was transported for sale and the same was recovered from the premises of the petitioner. Hence the case. 3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that already co- accused were arrested and no recovery or seizure directly from the petitioner herein and no contraband or incriminating material was seized from his possession or house in his presence. However, the petitioner is ready to abide by the conditions imposed by this Court. 4. The learned Government Advocate [Criminal Side] appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submits that the petitioner was found in possession of 3 kilograms of Ganja for sale and it was recovered from the premises of the petitioner and the petitioner actively participated in the crime. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is having specific overt-act of possession of ganja and if the anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, he would indulge in similar offences in future, hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 03.11.2025 MSM Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To 1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police Vellimedupettai Police Station Villupuram District Crime No. 132 of 2025. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis K.RAJASEKAR J. MSM Crl.O.P.No. 29802 of 2025 03.11.2025 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis