IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA HRRP NO. 11 OF 2024 BETWEEN SMT SAVITHRAMMA, W/O BASAVAIAH, AGED 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1824, RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 560040 AND PLACE OF BUSINESS AT M/S SOUTHERN TRAVELS, GROUND FLOOR, RATHNA MANSION, NO.65, 5TH MAIN ROAD, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE 560 009, SINCE DECEASED AND REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1. SRI B VEERAPPA, S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AND LATE SMT SAVITHRAMMA, AGED 65 YEARS, ...2 HRRP NO. 11/2024 2 2. SRI B GIRISH MAHADEV S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AND LATE SMT SAVITHRAMMA, AGED 59 YEARS, 3. SRI B BASAVARAJU, S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AND LATE SMT SAVITHRAMMA, AGED 50 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.10/57, GATTIGERE NEW LAYOUT, BEML LAYOUT, RAJA RAJESHWARI NAGAR, BANGALORE 560098 . …PETITIONER/S (By Sri./Smt : S SHAKER SHETTY AND A ANIL KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATES) AND SMT E RATHNAMMA, W/O LATE ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.113/17, 2ND FLOOR, I MAIN, GAYATHRI DEVI PARK EXTENSION, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE 560 003. SINCE DECEASED AND REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES …3 HRRP NO. 11/2024 3 1. E YELLAPPA, S/O LATE Y ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PREVIOUSLY RESIDING AT NO.113/17, II FLOOR, I MAIN ROAD, GAYATHRI DEVI PARK EXTENSION, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE 560 003. AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT NO.202, SRI VASISHTA, NO.18, 5TH TEMPLE STREET, 15TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU 560 003. 2. MR E PUNDAREEK, S/O LATE Y ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.294, I CROSS, CAMBRIDGE LAYOUT, ULSOOR, BANGALORE 560008. …RESPONDENTS (By Sri./Smt : P.B. APAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2 IN CP 73/2015; P.B.APPAIAH, M.KRISHNA KUMAR AND SUMANTHA.S, ADVOCATES FOR C/R1 IN CP 13060/24) HRRP FILED UNDER SECTION 46(1) OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XVIII ACMM. COURT …4 HRRP NO. 11/2024 4 OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, IN EX NO.124/2014 PASSED ON 07.03.2015 AND ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT. The HRRP coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following Order. ORAL ORDER Sri. Soman, representing Sri. S.Shaker Shetty, learned counsel on record for the petitioners seeks time to comply the office objections. Sri. Sumanth representing Sri.P.B.Appaiah appears through video conference and submits that sufficient time has been granted already but without complying the office objections, the petitioners are dragging on the matter. Record discloses, justification in the submissions made that sufficient time has been granted to comply the office objections. However, to give fair opportunity, time for a week is granted to comply the office objections. …3 HRRP NO. 11/2024 5 In case office objections are not complied within the time grated, the petition be dismissed without further reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Vide Court Order dated 10.02.2025, office objections are not complied with, hence petition stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: SR R By: RG C By: GS Ty Date:28.07.2025 C Date: 30.07.2025