[2025:RJ-JP:30496] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6702/2025 Anand Shandilya S/o Late Shri Vijay Kumar, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Flat No. 902, Kings Landing Apartment A-40, Tilak Nagar, Thana Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7160/2025 Sahil Bhurani S/o Shri Rajkumar Bhurani, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 5, Near Of Puskrana Temple, Khairthal District Khairthal, Tizara (Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Mr. Ashok Choudhary, Mr. Pulkit Roj Verma, Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.137/2025 registered at Police Station Ramganj (Jaipur City North), District Jaipur City [2025:RJ-JP:30496] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6702/2025] (North) for the offence(s) under Sections 308(2), 351(2), 352, 61(2) and 111(3) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that prima-facie, the offence under Section 308(2) is not made out against the petitioners. The accused-petitioners have not extorted any money or demanded any money from the complainant or the witnesses. It is also contended that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 26.04.2025 and 13.05.2025 respectively and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications and contended that the accused-petitioners telephonically threatened the executive of the Meesho Company to allot them franchisee of the Meesho company. It is also contended that the accused-petitioner- Anand Shandilya is a habitual offender and against him 11 cases have been registered at various institutions, therefore, the bail applications of the accused- petitioners may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. The charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners have already been submitted before the concerned Court. The accused- petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, without [2025:RJ-JP:30496] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6702/2025] commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Anand Shandilya S/o Late Shri Vijay Kumar and 2. Sahil Bhurani S/o Shri Rajkumar Bhurani, in connection with FIR No.137/2025 registered at Police Station Ramganj (Jaipur City North), District Jaipur City (North), shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner- Anand Shandilya is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Magistrate. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR ), J Keshav/104-105