Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20712 (CHH)

RAMAYAN PRASAD SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3627/2021 · 2025-08-24

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3627 of 2021  Ramayan Prasad Sahu S/o Late Dukhuram Sahu, Aged About 48 Years R/o Village - Dongri, Police Station And Tahsil - Baloda, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Secretary, School Education Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. The District Education Officer, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Baloda, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advocate Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.08.25 18:00:05 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 25-08-2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favor of petitioner to prefer a representation raising all his grievances before respondent No. 2, who in turn may be directed to consider and decide the representation in objective manner within stipulated time. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Accordingly, this petition is hereby being disposed of reserving liberty in favor of petitioner to make a representation raising all his grievances before the respondent authorities, who in turn are directed to consider and decide such representation, if so moved by petitioner expeditiously, strictly in accordance with law. 4) With the aforesaid direction(s), this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya