Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20711 (JHR)

MAHESH MINZ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6963/2025 · 2025-08-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23068 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6963 of 2025 Mahesh Minz, son of late Chamra Minz, aged about 35 years, Resident of Villag-Banda Garsul Road Banda, Dahusodang, Namkum, PO & PS- Namkum, Dist.-Ranchi (Jharkhand) … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) :Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate For the State :Mr. Achinto Sen, APP -------- Order No. 02 /Dated: 8th August 2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with ST Case No. 343 of 2024 arising out of Dhurwa PS Case No. 379 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that out of 13 charge-sheeted witnesses nine witnesses including the informant have been examined in the instant case. He further submits that the informant and other witnesses have not supported the prosecution case and there is no criminal antecedent against this petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.12.2023 as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 5. After going through the evidence of P.W.9 specially para 2, 5 & 6 it appears that there was a land dispute. It further appears that the charge has been framed on 05.06.2024 against this petitioner and out of 13 witnesses 9 witnesses have been examined who have not supported the prosecution case and I.O and Doctor are still to be examined. 2025:JHHC:23068 2 6. Looking to the fact that there is no chance of early conclusion of trial coupled with the period of custody of the petitioner, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-VI, Ranchi, in connection with ST Case No. 343 of 2024 arising out of Dhurwa PS Case No. 379 of 2023. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall cooperate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit