[2025:RJ-JP:27090] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8591/2025 1. Jagdish Prasad Rayal S/o Sh. Noparam, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Sutod, Distt. Sikar (Raj.)-332041 (Vehicle No. Rj23 Pb 0631). 2. Subhash Chand S/o Sh. Ramgopal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o- Kanwarpura, Distt. Sikar (Raj.)-332001 (Vehicle No. Rj23 Pb 6001). 3. Mahendra Singh S/o Sh. Rugharam, Aged About 48 Years, R/o-Lalana, Sutod, Distt. Sikar (Raj.)-332041 (Vehicle No. Rj23 Pc 0068). 4. Santosh Kanwar W/o Sh. Dilip Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o- Nasnwa, Teh. Laxmangarh, Distt. Sikar (Raj.)- 332041 (Vehicle No. Rj23 Pb 4029). 5. Sohan Singh S/o Sh. Amar Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o- Rajputo Ka Mohalla, Lodsar Tanwara, Distt. Nagaur (Raj.)-341022 (Vehicle No. Rj37 Pb 2171). 6. Surendra Kumar S/o Sh. Jeevanram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o- Sutod, Teh. Laxmangarh, Distt. Sikar (Raj.)- 332041 (Vehicle No. Rj23 Pb 8571). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Transport Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner Of Transports Transport Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahkarmarg, Jaipur. 3. Regional Transport Officer, Sikar, Rto Office, Sikar. 4. District Transport Officer, Sikar, Dto Office, Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Chaudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a representation was submitted by the petitioners before the respondent No.3-Regional Transport Officer, Sikar with regard to [2025:RJ-JP:27090] (2 of 2) [CW-8591/2025] the illegal plying of the buses of other category routes/permits. Pursuant thereto, vide order dated 17.04.2025 respondent No.3- Regional Transport Officer directed the respondent No.4-District Transport Officer, Sikar to conduct enquiry into the matter and take action if vehicles are found plying/operating against the rules. Thereafter, on 06.05.2025, again a reminder was sent by respondent No.3 but till date neither any enquiry has been conducted nor any order has been passed in pursuance of the directions issued by the respondent No.3. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant liberty to the petitioners to approach directly respondent No.4-District Transport Officer, Sikar by filing a comprehensive representation for their grievance. If any such representation is filed by the petitioners within a period of two weeks from today, respondent No.4-District Transport Officer, Sikar is directed to pass a reasoned/speaking order on the representation within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of representation along with certified copy of this order. Needless to say that order shall be passed after giving opportunity of hearing to the affected persons. With the aforesaid direction, this civil writ petition as well as pending application(s), if any, is disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /58