1 Items No. 41 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(CRP(CRP Art.227)No.83 of 2024 Ahingshangbam Ningol Thounaojam Ongbi Sumati Devi Applicant Vs. Soibam Helen Singh & 10 Ors. Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR ORDER 21.02.2025 Mr. L. Gunindro, learned counsel, appears for the applicant and Mr. LN. Ngamba, learned counsel, appears for the respondents. The instant application has been filed for condoning the delay of 841 days in filing the Civil Revision Petition (CRP) under Article 227 of the constitution of India challenging the order of the trial court. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that though there is no such provision to file condone delay application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India but the Registry has insisting upon to file such application for number the Civil Revision Petition and therefore, the instant application has been filed by the applicant for condoning the delay of 841 days in filing the said CRP. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has also reiterated the stand that the said application may not be necessary in filing the CRP under Article 227 of the Constitution of India but the applicant has to satisfy with sufficient reason that there is no any delay or laches for filing the CRP. However, at the time of admission, it can be decided whether there is any delay 2 or laches on the part of the petitioner. In such circumstances, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks to withdraw the present application. This Court also viewed that the aforesaid condone delay application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not necessary. Accordingly, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks to withdraw the instant application and to approach the Registry for numbering the CRP in accordance with Rules. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. CHIEF JUSTICE John Kom