Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 206984 (MAD)

HDB Financial Services Limited v. Sanjaikumar Marappan

Arb Appln/1088/2025 · 2025-11-13

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arbitration Application No.1088 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Arbitration Application No.1088 of 2025 M/s.HDB Financial Services Limited Having one of its Branch Office at : 4th Floor, Loyal Towers, No.68/2, Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006. Rep by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Saravanan.P .... Petitioner Vs 1.Sanjaikumar Marappan 2.Marappan Pandiyannan .... Respondents Prayer : Application (Commercial Division) filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Section 9(ii) (d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the “AL3118” Commercial Vehicle bearing Registration No.TN-88-B-3175 Engine No.GFEZ401401 and Chassis No.MB1KACFD2GEFU2324 available at the respondent's premises or wherever found and permit the Advocate Commissioner to obtain police aid and to break open the premises and pass orders. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arbitration Application No.1088 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Arunachalam ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing today, Mr.L.Baskaran, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing on behalf of the Superintendent of Police, Namakkal, has placed the report of enquiry conducted by the Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District. 2. On going through the same, it is seen that after collecting the statements of police officials as well as other witnesses, an FIR has been registered in Crime No.312/2025 on the file of Puduchatram Police Station, Namakkal, for offences under Section 132, 316(2), 49 BNS Act, against the four named accused persons. A1 has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.10.2025. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that insofar as other accused persons are concerned, already notices have been issued under Section 35(3) of BNSS Act and they have been called for enquiry. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arbitration Application No.1088 of 2025 4. Mr.R.Vijayaragavan, Additional Superintendent of Police, Cyber Crime, Namakkal District and Ms.V.Gomathi, Inspector of Police, Puduchathiram Police Station, Namakkal District, are present today at the time of hearing. 5. It is also brought to the notice of the Court that the additional remuneration has been paid to the Advocate Commissioner and the vehicle has been re-possessed and action has been taken by the police. 6. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in this application and accordingly, this application is disposed of. No costs. 13.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes / No ds 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arbitration Application No.1088 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH,J. ds Arbitration Application No.1088 of 2025 13.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis