Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2069 (PNJ)

TARA SINGH v. SURABHI MALIK IAS AND ANOTHER

COCP/4440/2025 · 2026-04-09

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-4440 IN THE HI 109 Tara Singh Surabhi Mal CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW others’ whe representatio within a peri 2. respondent R-2) append of affidavit Punjab, Cha such, nothing 3. 4440-2025 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o ingh Versus hi Malik and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Abdul Aziz, Advocate for t Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 21.02.2025 (Annex CWP-5054-2025, titled as ‘Tara S whereby it had been directed that entation within a period of 04 week a period of 02 months thereafter. At the very outset, it is subm dent-State that vide Speaking Order ppended with the compliance report d idavit of Ms. Surabhi Malik, Director , Chandigarh, representation of the pe nothing survives in the present petition Heard. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4440-2025 Date of Decision: 09.04.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA te for the petitioner. AAG, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Tara Singh vs. State of Punjab and d that in case, the petitioner files weeks, the same shall be decided submitted by learned counsel for Order dated 30.08.2025 (Annexure eport dated 04.12.2025 filed by way irector of Industries and Commerce the petitioner has been decided. As etition. ging Writ and files ided for xure way erce As RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.10 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-4440 4. required to b of, according 5. Speaking O law, if so adv 6. 7. 09.04.2026 rishu 4440-2025 -2- In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. The petitioner would be at libe Order dated 30.08.2025 (Annexu so advised. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid nnexure R-2), in accordance with any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No are sed said with RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.10 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.