Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20682 (KAR)

SMT. VIJYALAKSHMI v. AUTHORISED OFFICER

WP/10261/2021 · 2025-01-09

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:817 WP No. 10261 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 10261 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O P.NANDAKUMAR, R/A NO.2/21, 4TH CROSS, WILSON GARDEN, BANGALORE-560 027. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.MOHAN., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. AUTHORISED OFFICER, DEWAN HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED, NO.13, OLD NO.5, 1ST MAIN ROAD, NEAR KODAVA SAMAJA, VASANTH NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 052. 2. MR. G.SANKETH, MAJOR, S/O MR. G.BHAKTHAVATSALAM, R/A FLAT NO A-18G2, BRIGADE MEADOWS APARTMENTS, KANAKAPURA ROAD, UDHYAPURA POST, OPP. ANJENEYA TEMPLE, BANGALORE-560 082. 3. INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL, ADDRESS: 6TH FLOOR, HDIL TOWERS, ANANT KANEKAR MARG, STATION ROAD, BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI-400 051. E-MAIL ID: DHFLADMINISTRATOR@DHFL.COM …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:817 WP No. 10261 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 08.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner it was ordered to be listed on 09.01.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel of the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3