[2025:RJ-JP:401] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9417/2024 Anil Kumar S/o Shri Banwarilal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Gramin Kshetriya Baroda Bank Wali Gali, Mania, Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of India, North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi. 2. Directorate General, Sashastra Seema Bal, East Block-V, R.k. Puram, New Delhi Through Its Commandant (Rectt) 3. Second-In-Command, Presiding Officer, Recrutiment Board, Sector-Head Quarter, Sashastra Seema Bal, Goakhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sumit Teterwal with Mr. Chinmay Sharma for Mr. R.D. Rastogi, ASG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 03/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has applied for the post of post of Head Constable, 2023 (Veterinary) pursuant to the advertisement. It is further submitted that after qualifying PST, PET and written examination the petitioner was short listed for document verification and medical examination/review medical examination vide notice dated 22.03.2024. [2025:RJ-JP:401] (2 of 3) [CW-9417/2024] Further, it is submitted that during document verification, the candidature of the petitioner was rejected under EWS category on the ground that petitioner did not possess the desired EWS certificate for the year 2023-24. Furthermore, it is submitted that certificates for the year 2020-21, 2022-23 and 2024-25 were duly placed on record however, certificate for the year 2023-24 was inadvertently forgotten to be placed on record by the petitioner. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner is meritorious candidate under EWS category therefore deserves to be considered under the said category. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has refuted the contentions averred by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that the petition lacks territorial jurisdiction, and as on date, selection process has been concluded therefore, for the said post no vacancies are available. Heard and considered. Considering the arguments made by learned counsel for the respective sides, this Court deems it apposite to dispose of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the competent authority/respondent No. 1, and the same be adjudicated by way of speaking order and strictly in accordance with law. It is further directed that the said representation be considered with a sympathetic approach and if any seat is vacant qua the said post, then it is directed that petitioner shall be considered for the same if found eligible, and on account of procedural failure shall not be rejected as the same is curable. [2025:RJ-JP:401] (3 of 3) [CW-9417/2024] Accordingly, the present petition is hereby disposed of with the above said liberty, sans entering into the arena of territorial jurisdiction. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /92