Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20679 (JHR)

TINKU QURAISHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4345/2025 · 2025-08-13

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:23445 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4345 of 2025 Tinku Quraishi, aged about 45 years, son of Mokhtar Quraishi, resident of Taigi Nagar Quraishi Mohalla, Lohardaga, P.O., P.S. and District-Lohardaga ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Altmash Khan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl. P.P. 04/ 13.08.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Senha P.S. Case No. 76 of 2022, registered under section 12 (1) (2) of Jharkhand Bovine Animals Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005 and under sections 3/11/29/35/38 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M, Lohardaga. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation is made of carrying bovine animals and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 5 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and draws the attention of the Court to the impugned order and submits that in the impugned order it has been clearly stated that petitioner has one criminal case of identical nature being Lohardaga P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020. 5. Considering that false affidavit has been made by the petitioner in para 5 of the petition that he has no criminal antecedent in view of that I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is hereby rejected. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-