HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1734 of 2024 Court No. - 90 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist has made a statement at the Bar that the revisionist has passed away, as the revisionist is the accused in the present revision and, therefore, nothing survive against the accused who has already passed away and as such, the revision has become infructuous. 3. In view of the above statement, the instant revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 7, 2025 Vikram Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anshul Tiwari, G.A. (Harvir Singh,J.) Anuj Sharma @ Annu .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad