[2025:RJ-JP:31404] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7141/2025 Pappu @ Sharif @ Saleem S/o Jaan Bahadur Khan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o House No. 155 Bismilla Nagar Chawani Ashraf Khan Police Station Prem Nagar Ijjat Nagar District Bareli Ut- tarpradesh (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikandar Ali Chopdar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.49/2024 registered at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, District Jaipur City (North) (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402, 419 & 420 of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402, 419, 420 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that similarly situated co-accused persons namely- Aman Khan Chishti @ Baba Khan and Rashid Husain Abrar Husain Ansari @ Ismail @ Hayat have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Counsel submits that according to the prosecution [2025:RJ-JP:31404] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7141/2025] story, main accused is Mohammad Rijwan Khan @ Guddu @ Sonu @ Manoj. Counsel submits that one other case has also been registered against the petitioner wherein he is on bail. Counsel submits that till date, eighteen witnesses have been examined out of twenty six cited prosecution witnesses. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 03.02.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. He submits that trial is at fag end and while rejecting the third bail application of co-accused- Mohammad Rijwan Khan @ Guddu @ Sonu @ Manoj, co-ordinate Bench of this Court directed the learned trial Court to expedite the trial. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that similarly situated co-accused persons namely- Aman Khan Chisti @ Baba Khan and Rashid Husain Abrar Husain Ansari @ Ismail @ Hayat have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Pappu @ Sharif @ Saleem S/o Jaan Bahadur Khan shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a [2025:RJ-JP:31404] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7141/2025] personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /84