Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20677 (AP)

JIGGIREDDY MANIKANTA MOHAN v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14745/2025 · 2025-07-22

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010291202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14745/2025 Between: 1. JIGGIREDDY MANIKANTA MOHAN, S/O SRINU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, D.NO 1-91/1, BC COLONY, ROWTHULAPUDI (V), ROWTHULAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA (EARLIER EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT) 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PRI DIVISION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT 4. THE M P D O ROWTHULAPUDI MANDAL, , ROWTHULAPUDI, KAKINADA DISTRICT 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the highhanded action on the part of the respondents hot releasing and pay the bill amounts worth of Rs. 1,13,571.77/- with interest under the grant of the GGMP funds to the petittioner even after completion of the execution of work is illegal arbitrary and violation of article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to release and pay the bill amount worth of Rs. 1,13,571.77/-with Interest under the grant of GGMP funds to the petittioner forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release and pay the bill amount worth of Rs.1,13,571.771- with Interest under the grant of GGMP funds to the petittioner forthwith and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAMEERA BOKKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14745 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The petitioner had been awarded the contract of work(s) under the subject scheme in Kakinada District. After execution of the said contract, a final bill was prepared for a sum of Rs.1,13,571.77/- as per the sanctioned orders. As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition. 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of the aforesaid sum of money, no payment is being made. The petitioner contends that such non- payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the interference of this Court. 3. This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest. 4. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader placed on record written instructions submitted by the Executive Engineer, PRI Division, Kakinada, wherein, it is stated that since the budget was not released by the Government, the bills were not paid to the petitioner. Soon after release of the budget by the Government, the bills will be paid to the petitioner. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances submitted in the affidavit, and the directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amount of Rs.1,13,571.77/- to the petitioner. 6. As far as interest component is concerned, if there is any subsisting clause in the agreement/work order envisaging payment or non-payment of interest upon any amount which is due and payable, the same is binding upon both the parties. In the absence of any clause with regard to interest component in the agreement, the respondents are directed to release the amount along with the interest @ 6% per annum on delayed payment, in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.724 of 2021 and batch dated 12.10.2023 if not paid, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It would also be open to the petitioner to agitate his claim for higher rate of interest, if any payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA,J 23.07.2025 JLV 255 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14745 OF 2025 23.07.2025 JLV