2025:JHHC:24815 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5840 of 2017 Kameshwar Ram, S/o Late Shri Muneshwar Ram, R/o Adarash Nagar, Bariya, P.O. Sudna, P.S. Medninagar, Dist. Palamau, Jharkhand ......Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Human Resource Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa P.S.-Jagarnathpur, Dist-Ranchi. Jharkhand 3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, P.O. & P.S.- Medninagar, Dist.- Palamau 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Palamau, P.O. & P.S.- Medninagar, Dist.- Palamau ...Respondents -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Ruby Yadav, A.C to S .C.-VI --- 13/14.08.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the Petitioner for the following reliefs: i) For giving the promotion to the petitioner on Grade-IV, Graduate Trained Scale from the year 1996. ii) For giving the promotion to the petitioner from Grade-IV, Graduate Trained Scale to Grade-VII. Post Graduate Trained Scale from the year 2002. iii) For giving the entire monetary/consequential benefits from the date of promotion for which petitioner is legally entitled. 2025:JHHC:24815 2 3. During course of argument, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that even after a lapse of almost 8 years, the respondents have not taken pain to consider the case of the Petitioner by passing any order. Accordingly, the concerned Respondent may be directed to take a decision in the matter. 4. Ld. Counsel for the Respondents submits that the prayer of the Petitioner is not sustainable; however, he could not dispute the fact that his case has not yet been considered by passing a reasoned order. 5. Accordingly, this writ application is hereby disposed of by granting liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh representation before the concerned Respondent along with all necessary documents in support of his claim within a period of 4 weeks. If any, such representation is preferred before the concerned Respondent, the same may be disposed of by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with applicable Rules and Regulations within a period of 12 weeks and the copy of the same be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) jk