2025:HHC:26484 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 156 of 2023 Decided on : 06.08.2025 Ram Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General apprises the Court that needful has been done and the judgment in issue now stands complied with. 2. In the light of the instructions handed over to the Court, these proceedings are closed but with the observation that the emoluments, to which the petitioner is entitled to, be released in his favour, within a period of two months from today. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:26484 If needful is not done, within a period of two months, the petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application for revival of the petition and Registry shall not insist upon the application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 06, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)