APHC010290862017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28286/2017 Between: 1. SMT. T.KAMALAMMA, W/O NARAYAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, TELUGU PANDIT GRADE II, SRI VENKATESHWARA AIDED HIGH SCHOOL, BAYANAPALLI, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CORRESPONDANT, SRI VENKATESHWARA AIDED HIGH SCHOOL, BAYANNAPALLI, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, Y.S.R.DISTRIT. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL, EDUCATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 4. THE COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL, EDUCATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM, AMRAVATHI, KRISHNA DISTRICT,A.P. 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,AMARAVATHI, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. D KALPANA, W/O AND AGE NOT NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, TELUGU PANDIT GRADE I, SRI VENKATESHWARA AIDED HIGH SCHOOL, BAYANNAPALLI, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SAI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) 2 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: “….to issue an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, call for the records relating to and connected with impugned proceedings in Ref.No.09/SVHS/appointment-Aided/2017- 18 dt.24.6.2017 of the 1st respondent and set aside the same by holding it as illegal, arbitrary, discrimination, unfair, unjust and contrary to the rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.1 Education Department dt.1.1.1994, orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.75,School Education Department dt.23.9.2002 and G.O.Ms.No.41 dt.30.6.2017 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to consider my case and promote to the post of Telugu Pandit Grade I with all consequential benefits from the date on which the said post was filled up by direct recruitment….” 2. On 01.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 12.09.2025 under the caption „for dismissal’. On 12.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the same caption of dismissal. 3. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption „for dismissal‟, none appeared for the petitioner. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 19.09.2025 Ivd 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.28286 of 2017 Date: 19.09.2025 Ivd